More than 700 events Ā· 14m room nights Ā· US$12bn GVA Ā· 49 countries Ā· 180 cities Ā· in the past 12 months

Climate risk tourism assessment: see how climate risk reaches demand before it reaches the asset.

Ask an investment committee how exposed a coastal hotel is to climate risk and they will produce a flood map, a heat-day count, an insurer's rating. Ask how exposed its bookings are and the answer is usually silence.
Demand moves years before physical conditions do. Source markets shift as summers get hotter. Insurers reprice before a claim is filed. Sustainable aviation fuel changes a route's economics before any aircraft needs replacing. Base, downside, and opportunity, with the assumption behind each stated.

A tenth of the world's output and employment depends on the visitor economy

Living Lab’s first economic model was for the Singapore Grand Prix in 2012. In 2025 we became a software platform: government-grade intelligence for the visitor economy

In the last 12 months we have deployed at more than 700 events. They delivered 14 million room nights and over US$12bn in gross value added

What does Living Lab do for climate risk tourism assessment?

Climate risk tourism assessment. Living Lab connects the earlier, faster-moving signals a physical-risk survey does not cover, source-market booking patterns, sustainable-fuel cost paths, carbon pricing, insurer repricing, and vectorises them into demand scenarios an investment committee can price against. Reference data is published by the UNFCCC.

Attributes what has already moved: which source markets shifted timing after a hot summer, which routes lost economics as fuel cost rose, where insurance repricing reached financing cost. Signal137 shows the committee what the demand base has done, so the exposure is measured rather than described.

Tests the asset, route, or destination forward: a heat-days path, a sustainable-fuel cost path, an insurance-repricing signal, run through the same economic model used everywhere else. Where peak-season demand erodes and where shoulder-season demand forms. Demand137 brings the scenario range to the table at the point of decision, not after it.

ProductYour questionYou getWhat it changes
Demand137Whether to finance or develop a heat-exposed or coastal assetA forward demand scenario under climate and transition assumptions, not only a structural exposure mapThe investment priced against demand resilience, not structural exposure alone
Demand137Does the route or airport investment stay viable under transition cost pressure?Route-level demand and cost scenarios reflecting sustainable-fuel price and carbon-cost pathsRoutes and capacity chosen that hold across more than one cost scenario
Demand137Where to direct tourism investment as climate patterns shiftA scenario range across base, downside, and opportunity, not a single forecastCapital directed toward demand that will materialise
Demand137Where is the opportunity in the same shift?Shoulder-season and northern-latitude demand capture as travellers move timingInvestment or marketing aimed at the demand the shift is creating
Demand137Can we substitute our own climate assumptions?Yes. A lender's, insurer's, or internal climate desk's assumption set dropped inThe scenario runs on the committee's own house view
Demand137How far forward do the scenarios run?Matched to the investment or financing horizon: a booking cycle to a multi-year holdThe horizon is the decision's, not a default
Signal137What has the demand base already done?Source-market timing, route economics, and financing cost attributed to the climate signalThe exposure measured, not described
BothHow is this different from a physical climate-risk assessment?It models demand and revenue, which usually move first; the physical survey models the structureComplementary, not competing, and stated as such
BothDoes this replace our insurer's or lender's requirement?No. It produces the demand-side evidence those requirements do not coverThe case put to the insurer or lender is stronger, not substituted
BothWhat if the scenarios show the asset is exposed?Reported as foundA comparison only useful when it confirms the answer wanted is reassurance, not evidence

Price the demand risk before the physical one

Calendar optimisation example

USE CASES

La Sagra

The US$50 billion tourism reallocation

International visitors to the United States fell 4.2% in 2025, the first annual decline since the pandemic, while worldwide travel grew. The spending did not disappear. It moved. Five economies are absorbing most of it, and the shift now looks structural.

Read More Ā»

Advancing the Tourism Industry

Show me the evidence

Tell us the question. We'll bring back the answer.

Come and show your working

We turn messy event and tourism data into decisions that help communities grow. Bring curiosity and rigour. We will hand you questions nobody has answered yet.