| Demand137 | Whether to finance or develop a heat-exposed or coastal asset | A forward demand scenario under climate and transition assumptions, not only a structural exposure map | The investment priced against demand resilience, not structural exposure alone |
| Demand137 | Does the route or airport investment stay viable under transition cost pressure? | Route-level demand and cost scenarios reflecting sustainable-fuel price and carbon-cost paths | Routes and capacity chosen that hold across more than one cost scenario |
| Demand137 | Where to direct tourism investment as climate patterns shift | A scenario range across base, downside, and opportunity, not a single forecast | Capital directed toward demand that will materialise |
| Demand137 | Where is the opportunity in the same shift? | Shoulder-season and northern-latitude demand capture as travellers move timing | Investment or marketing aimed at the demand the shift is creating |
| Demand137 | Can we substitute our own climate assumptions? | Yes. A lender's, insurer's, or internal climate desk's assumption set dropped in | The scenario runs on the committee's own house view |
| Demand137 | How far forward do the scenarios run? | Matched to the investment or financing horizon: a booking cycle to a multi-year hold | The horizon is the decision's, not a default |
| Signal137 | What has the demand base already done? | Source-market timing, route economics, and financing cost attributed to the climate signal | The exposure measured, not described |
| Both | How is this different from a physical climate-risk assessment? | It models demand and revenue, which usually move first; the physical survey models the structure | Complementary, not competing, and stated as such |
| Both | Does this replace our insurer's or lender's requirement? | No. It produces the demand-side evidence those requirements do not cover | The case put to the insurer or lender is stronger, not substituted |
| Both | What if the scenarios show the asset is exposed? | Reported as found | A comparison only useful when it confirms the answer wanted is reassurance, not evidence |