| Demand137 | Whether to bid at all, and at what level of public commitment | A modelled range against a stated counterfactual, not a single comparator figure | A bid position, and a walk-away point, set before the deadline forces one |
| Demand137 | What funding structure and risk-sharing to propose | Attributable value split by funding partner, net of displacement, leakage, and deadweight | Terms negotiated from a shared evidence base, not a headline pitch |
| Demand137 | What does declining cost us? | The decline position as the reference point, stated rather than assumed | The cost of not bidding is on the table beside the cost of bidding |
| Demand137 | What if we bid and lose? | Bid costs incurred, no hosting benefit, as an explicit downside case | The downside owned, not hidden |
| Demand137 | Can this recommend against bidding? | Yes. A bid that only produces value under optimistic assumptions is reported as that | Advocacy with numbers attached is not a business case |
| Demand137 | Will the supply chain cope with the fans? | Absorptive capacity by supply chain: beds, drivers, caterers, airlift | The kegs and the beds sized before the weekend, not counted after |
| Signal137 | What did the fee actually buy? | Attributed value against the case that funded it, net of displacement and deadweight | The finance director's question answered at audit |
| Signal137 | How does the outturn compare with the business case? | Ex-ante and ex-post on one method | The next bid is priced on what the last one delivered |
| Both | How is this different from the feasibility study our bid team commissioned? | That tests whether the bid is deliverable; this tests whether it is worth doing | Operational and economic cases run side by side |
| Both | Who holds this, and where? | Model, data, and a trained team inside your jurisdiction | The capability survives the change of official or consultant |