More than 700 events Ā· 14m room nights Ā· US$12bn GVA Ā· 49 countries Ā· 180 cities Ā· in the past 12 months

Event hosting business case: know the conditions that make an event worth hosting.

Most hosting decisions are won or lost on optimism: a comparator city's headline number, a federation's promise of prestige, a sponsor deadline that will not move. By the time anyone asks what the bid would deliver net of what would have happened anyway, the political position is already set.
Decline, bid and lose, bid and host: three positions with the counterfactual stated and the range attached. A business case that can recommend against hosting, so the one that recommends for it can be trusted.

A tenth of the world's output and employment depends on the visitor economy

Living Lab’s first economic model was for the Singapore Grand Prix in 2012. In 2025 we became a software platform: government-grade intelligence for the visitor economy

In the last 12 months we have deployed at more than 700 events. They delivered 14 million room nights and over US$12bn in gross value added

What does Living Lab do for event hosting business case?

Event hosting business case. Living Lab connects event demand, hotel and short-term rental capacity, route capacity, and comparable hosting decisions elsewhere to the specific bid under consideration, and runs it through a model that states its counterfactual, displacement, and deadweight assumptions. Reference data is published by the OECD.

Accounts for a bid or hosting decision already committed or delivered: gross activity through counterfactual, displacement, and leakage to attributable value, so the original business case and the actual outturn can be checked against each other. Signal137 is the answer to the finance director who asks what the fee bought.

Tests the bid before the deadline forces a position: whether to bid at all, at what level of public commitment, what funding structure and risk-sharing to propose. Attributable value split by funding partner, net of displacement. Demand137 sets the bid position and the walk-away point before the sponsor deadline sets them for you.

ProductYour questionYou getWhat it changes
Demand137Whether to bid at all, and at what level of public commitmentA modelled range against a stated counterfactual, not a single comparator figureA bid position, and a walk-away point, set before the deadline forces one
Demand137What funding structure and risk-sharing to proposeAttributable value split by funding partner, net of displacement, leakage, and deadweightTerms negotiated from a shared evidence base, not a headline pitch
Demand137What does declining cost us?The decline position as the reference point, stated rather than assumedThe cost of not bidding is on the table beside the cost of bidding
Demand137What if we bid and lose?Bid costs incurred, no hosting benefit, as an explicit downside caseThe downside owned, not hidden
Demand137Can this recommend against bidding?Yes. A bid that only produces value under optimistic assumptions is reported as thatAdvocacy with numbers attached is not a business case
Demand137Will the supply chain cope with the fans?Absorptive capacity by supply chain: beds, drivers, caterers, airliftThe kegs and the beds sized before the weekend, not counted after
Signal137What did the fee actually buy?Attributed value against the case that funded it, net of displacement and deadweightThe finance director's question answered at audit
Signal137How does the outturn compare with the business case?Ex-ante and ex-post on one methodThe next bid is priced on what the last one delivered
BothHow is this different from the feasibility study our bid team commissioned?That tests whether the bid is deliverable; this tests whether it is worth doingOperational and economic cases run side by side
BothWho holds this, and where?Model, data, and a trained team inside your jurisdictionThe capability survives the change of official or consultant

Set the walk-away point before the deadline

Calendar optimisation example

USE CASES

La Sagra

A tourism asset rarely fails on its growth story

A hotel, a resort, or a mixed-use scheme fails underwriting when a single route, a single annual event, or a single source market turns out to be carrying more of the demand case than the committee realised. The dependency is the risk, and it can be measured before signature.

Read More Ā»

Monza pays for the race. Milan keeps the guests.

At the Italian Grand Prix, the fleet of guest vehicles arrives on German plates with German drivers. The hospitality guests do not sleep in Monza, which hosts the race. They sleep in Milan, which does not. The town that pays captures a fraction of what the event generates.

Read More Ā»

One system. The size of the prize.

Tourism is close to a tenth of the world’s output and employment, and almost every government still plans it in pieces. A country that governs its visitor economy as one system keeps more of what it pays for. On an illustrative US$20bn economy, five points of retention is US$1bn a year.

Read More Ā»

Advancing the Tourism Industry

Show me the evidence

Tell us the question. We'll bring back the answer.

Come and show your working

We turn messy event and tourism data into decisions that help communities grow. Bring curiosity and rigour. We will hand you questions nobody has answered yet.