More than 700 events Ā· 14m room nights Ā· US$12bn GVA Ā· 49 countries Ā· 180 cities Ā· in the past 12 months

Arena economic impact assessment: know whether the venue is creating demand or merely hosting it.

A full calendar says almost nothing about whether the business is getting stronger. An arena can report strong occupancy while filling its dates with events that would have happened somewhere else, or with visitors who were already in the city. Separate the demand you created from the demand you hosted.
Test a booking, a rights-fee renewal, a pricing policy, or a capital case before it is committed, across the whole calendar. Then account for what each event delivered, on the same evidence base, so the next negotiation starts from a number.

A tenth of the world's output and employment depends on the visitor economy

Living Lab’s first economic model was for the Singapore Grand Prix in 2012. In 2025 we became a software platform: government-grade intelligence for the visitor economy

In the last 12 months we have deployed at more than 700 events. They delivered 14 million room nights and over US$12bn in gross value added

What does Living Lab do for arena economic impact assessment?

Arena economic impact assessment. Living Lab connects the booking system to the signals around the venue: ticketing, nearby accommodation and short-term rental supply, visitor movement into the city, and pricing across comparable dates, so an attendee is traced back to where they came from and whether they would have visited anyway. Reference data is published by the OECD.

Attributes what a delivered event created: gross attendance through counterfactual and displacement to attributable local value. Every event in the calendar on one method, so a touring show and an international round read on the same terms and the rights fee is set against evidence. A subsidy case that survives the auditor’s first question about displacement.

Tests which future events, dates, or capital options will create real demand before you commit. Which dates carry pricing power and which are propped up by discounting. Demand trajectory by event type and source market, so capital goes where demand is durable rather than borrowed. Demand137 prices the calendar, not the date.

ProductYour questionYou getWhat it changes
Demand137Whether to bid for or renew a promoter or rights-holder relationshipIncremental demand the event creates once displacement of other bookings is countedBid, renew, or walk away with a defensible incremental-value case
Demand137How to price and allocate capacity across the calendarWhich dates carry real pricing power and which are propped up by discountingA calendar-wide pricing strategy, not a date-by-date guess
Demand137Where to target capital, from refurbishment to expansionDemand trajectory by event type and source market, not utilisation aloneCapital prioritised against durable demand, not borrowed demand
Demand137Are two events competing for the same weekend or the same audience?The whole calendar tested as one portfolioDates sequenced so events lift each other rather than cannibalise
Demand137What happens if we do nothing?Base, downside, and supported scenarios with a stated counterfactualThe cost of the status quo is priced alongside the cost of change
Signal137Did that event create new demand, or reshuffle what was already there?Gross attendance through counterfactual and displacement to attributable local valueAttendance and attributable value treated as two different numbers
Signal137Which events in the calendar earned their rights fee?Every event ranked on attributable value, on one methodThe renewal conversation starts from evidence
Signal137How do we defend the subsidy or public-funding case?A traceable path from public investment to attributable local valueOne evidence base the venue board and its funder can both stand behind
Signal137What did the visitors do, and where did they stay?Origin, stay length, spend, and movement around the venue, event by eventThe catchment is measured, not assumed
BothWho holds this, and where?Model, data, and a trained team inside your jurisdictionThe evidence survives the change of operator or board

Price the calendar on demand you created

Calendar optimisation example

USE CASES

La Sagra

A 100,000-seat stadium: build one less seat than you can sell

Manchester United’s proposed stadium is a Ā£2bn, 100,000-seat ground by Foster + Partners, with a target opening of 2030-31. The club and the regeneration case cite Ā£7.3bn a year for the economy and 92,000 jobs. Those are the promoters’ projections. Here is what to test before believing them.

Read More Ā»

Monza pays for the race. Milan keeps the guests.

At the Italian Grand Prix, the fleet of guest vehicles arrives on German plates with German drivers. The hospitality guests do not sleep in Monza, which hosts the race. They sleep in Milan, which does not. The town that pays captures a fraction of what the event generates.

Read More Ā»

The test was the World Cup. Here is what it showed.

Hand a country that is losing visitors the largest sporting event ever held on its soil, and see whether the event can overcome the friction. It could not. Measured per hotel across 16 host markets, the 2026 World Cup delivered as a tournament and failed as a remedy.

Read More Ā»

Advancing the Tourism Industry

Show me the evidence

Tell us the question. We'll bring back the answer.

Come and show your working

We turn messy event and tourism data into decisions that help communities grow. Bring curiosity and rigour. We will hand you questions nobody has answered yet.