More than 700 events Ā· 14m room nights Ā· US$12bn GVA Ā· 49 countries Ā· 180 cities Ā· in the past 12 months

Tourism investment case: turn a destination promise into an investable demand case.

A prospectus that leads with arrival numbers and a growth ambition reads like marketing to the audience it most needs to persuade. It gets read once, filed, and quietly excluded from the shortlist, with no feedback that says why.
A demand case in the investor's language, built before the meeting: origin, route, timing, and purpose, with local GVA and fiscal return net of leakage stated beside it. Handed to the investor's technical adviser intact, not reconstructed under time pressure once due diligence starts.

A tenth of the world's output and employment depends on the visitor economy

Living Lab’s first economic model was for the Singapore Grand Prix in 2012. In 2025 we became a software platform: government-grade intelligence for the visitor economy

In the last 12 months we have deployed at more than 700 events. They delivered 14 million room nights and over US$12bn in gross value added

What does Living Lab do for tourism investment case?

Tourism investment case. Living Lab builds the prospectus from the same evidence an investor’s own analysts would assemble: what the growth depends on, what happens if a single route or event underperforms, and whether the number holds net of displacement and leakage. Reference data is published by UN Tourism.

Attributes what the destination has already delivered to investors who committed: occupancy, rate, and retained value against the case that drew them in, and the local jobs, procurement, and tax the investment produced. Signal137 gives the agency the track record the next prospectus is built on, and the public-benefit case ministers and media can be shown together.

Tests the opportunity the way a committee will: base, downside, and diversification cases for each site or sector, dependency mapped across routes, markets, and the calendar, local return modelled net of leakage. Demand137 puts the destination on the shortlist and keeps it there through due diligence.

ProductYour questionYou getWhat it changes
Demand137What should the prospectus lead with?A demand case vectorised by origin, route, timing, and purpose, not a single arrival totalThe prospectus opens with the evidence a committee looks for first
Demand137Which sites or sectors to prioritise for inbound capitalDemand and dependency mapped across the destination's asset classes and locationsOutreach and incentives aimed at the opportunities the evidence supports
Demand137How do we answer due diligence without losing momentum?A traceable evidence base the destination can hand over intactInvestor questions answered from a base already prepared
Demand137What does the investor's own analyst see?The same dependency and downside test the committee will run, run firstThe questions anticipated rather than reacted to
Demand137Will this make the case look weaker if the demand does not support the ambition?Sometimes the honest range is smaller than the ambitionA prospectus that survives due diligence is worth more than one that reads well and gets filed
Signal137How do we show the local return the investment is meant to deliver?GVA, employment, and fiscal return net of leakage and displacement, not gross activityThe public benefit case defended to ministers, media, and the investor together
Signal137What did the last investment we attracted actually deliver?Occupancy, rate, retained value, and local jobs against the case that drew itThe track record the next prospectus is built on
Signal137How much of the value stayed in the country?Retained value by sector around the asset, with leakage namedThe sovereign benefit measured, not asserted
BothCan this go straight into a prospectus or a data room?Built to be handed over intact, assumptions and uncertainty statedThe evidence base is not rebuilt under pressure
BothDo you need our negotiation or investor terms?No. Public and licensed market data plus the destination, sites, and investor typeNegotiation terms stay with your own team

Write the prospectus in the investor's language

Calendar optimisation example

USE CASES

La Sagra

A tourism asset rarely fails on its growth story

A hotel, a resort, or a mixed-use scheme fails underwriting when a single route, a single annual event, or a single source market turns out to be carrying more of the demand case than the committee realised. The dependency is the risk, and it can be measured before signature.

Read More Ā»

Monza pays for the race. Milan keeps the guests.

At the Italian Grand Prix, the fleet of guest vehicles arrives on German plates with German drivers. The hospitality guests do not sleep in Monza, which hosts the race. They sleep in Milan, which does not. The town that pays captures a fraction of what the event generates.

Read More Ā»

One system. The size of the prize.

Tourism is close to a tenth of the world’s output and employment, and almost every government still plans it in pieces. A country that governs its visitor economy as one system keeps more of what it pays for. On an illustrative US$20bn economy, five points of retention is US$1bn a year.

Read More Ā»

Advancing the Tourism Industry

Show me the evidence

Tell us the question. We'll bring back the answer.

Come and show your working

We turn messy event and tourism data into decisions that help communities grow. Bring curiosity and rigour. We will hand you questions nobody has answered yet.