Which destinations will capture displaced US tourism demand?

Quick Navigation

US$50bn moved. US$10.6bn is contestable.

International arrivals to the United States fell 4.2% in 2025 while worldwide travel grew about 4%. Living Lab’s displacement model puts the forgone spending at roughly US$50bn. Most of it went somewhere.

US inbound visits declined 5.5% in 2025 to 68.3 million, against 79 million in 2019. Inbound spending fell to US$175bn. The causes were policy: visa issuance suspended to 75 countries, border device searches up 18%, tariff measures weighing on sentiment.

Living Lab’s displacement model puts the forgone spending at roughly US$50bn. That number is the headline. The number that matters to a destination is smaller: how much of it is contestable, and by whom.

Headline, not strategy

Displaced demand does not scatter evenly. It follows route capacity, hotel supply, visa regimes, and the events calendar. Five economies absorb most of it, and about US$10.6bn is contestable between them. Qatar stands to gain most as a share of its base, at 11.2%.

A tourism ministry cannot bid for a headline. It can bid for a segment: short-haul leisure, long-haul leisure, business events. Each moved for a different reason and landed in a different place.

A binding constraint is the first thing that stops you, not the worst thing about you.

Who captures it

Saudi Arabia: facilities and last mile. UAE: hotel headroom. Qatar: calendar size. Mexico: security perception. Canada: long-haul air beyond the gateways.

Relieve the constraint and the modelled capture becomes reachable. Address something else, however serious, and the capture stays where it is. That is why a list of a destination’s weaknesses is less useful than the name of the one that binds.

One binding constraint

The 2026 World Cup was the strongest pull a country can apply. Ticket demand ran at 30 times capacity. US inbound arrivals kept falling through the tournament window. A displacement that survives that is not a cycle. It is a new baseline, and the destinations receiving the demand can plan on it.

Did the Cup fix it?

US$50bn is a headline. US$10.6bn is a strategy. Name the constraint, cost the relief, and the bid becomes a case a finance ministry can fund.

The analysis is in the white papers. The forecasting method is on the page for demand forecasting and vectorisation, and the investment case on tourism investment and FDI attraction.

For further reading, see US Travel Association.

The capture test

Ask three questions of any growth target built on displaced demand. Which segment? Which constraint stops us capturing it? What does relieving that one constraint cost? A target that cannot answer all three is a hope.

La Sagra

A tourism asset rarely fails on its growth story

A hotel, a resort, or a mixed-use scheme fails underwriting when a single route, a single annual event, or a single source market turns out to be carrying more of the demand case than the committee realised. The dependency is the risk, and it can be measured before signature.

Read More Ā»

The US$50 billion tourism reallocation

International visitors to the United States fell 4.2% in 2025, the first annual decline since the pandemic, while worldwide travel grew. The spending did not disappear. It moved. Five economies are absorbing most of it, and the shift now looks structural.

Read More Ā»

Show me the evidence

Tell us the question. We'll bring back the answer.

USE CASES

Advancing the Tourism Industry