Does the market need more rooms, or a better pattern of demand?

Quick Navigation

18 peak nights. 347 ordinary ones.

A hotel pipeline decision is usually made on an occupancy trend, extrapolated forward. That answers a different question from the one a planning authority or an investor should ask.

Annual occupancy in a healthy market sits somewhere in the seventies. Extrapolate it and a new hotel looks justified. But annual occupancy is an average of two different markets: the 18 or so compression nights a year when the city is full and turning demand away, and the other 347 when rooms are available at a discount.

A hotel built for the average competes on the 347 nights and adds little on the 18. A hotel built for the 18 sits half empty the rest of the year. Which market the pipeline is meant to serve is the first question, and it is rarely asked.

Wrong question

The licensed hotel stock is not the supply. Short-term rentals absorb overflow on peak nights, and in many cities they are the marginal room. A market that looks tight on hotel data alone can be comfortably supplied once the listings are counted. The reverse is also true: a city whose short-term rental stock is being withdrawn by regulation can go from loose to tight in a year without a single hotel closing.

The pipeline decision has to be made against total effective supply, hotels and rentals together, or it is being made against half the picture.

Approve rooms the demand will fill, and sequence them so each opening is absorbed before the next.

Count all supply

Compression nights are made by the event calendar, the route capacity, and the seasonal pattern of the source markets, linked. A new route adds midweek business demand. A congress fills a specific week. A festival fills a weekend. Each is known in advance, and together they say which nights will be short of rooms two years from now, which is the horizon a pipeline decision needs.

Where compression starts

Three scenarios: no new supply, demand grows with no response, and new supply at the proposed scale and class. For each, the peak-night gap beside the average-night occupancy, so the committee sees whether the proposal solves the actual shortage or adds average-night competition to a market that already has enough.

Sometimes the answer is not to build. If the gap is covered by existing and informal supply, or the peak is too short to justify the keys, that is the result, and it is a better result than a hotel that opens into a market that did not need it.

Three scenarios

Room supply is the lever with the longest lead time and the least forgiveness. Approved against a remembered peak, it sits empty. Approved against forecast demand by location and by year, and sequenced so each opening is absorbed before the next, it fills.

The method is on the pages for hotels and accommodation and hotel and room-supply optimisation.

For further reading, see OECD Tourism Trends and Policies 2024.

The approval test

For any hotel approval, ask two numbers: the peak-night shortfall and the average-night occupancy, both against total supply including short-term rentals. If the proposal only solves the second, the market may not need it.

La Sagra

The US$50 billion tourism reallocation

International visitors to the United States fell 4.2% in 2025, the first annual decline since the pandemic, while worldwide travel grew. The spending did not disappear. It moved. Five economies are absorbing most of it, and the shift now looks structural.

Read More »

The problem with every sports venue is the other 300 days

A race track, an arena, a stadium: each is built for a peak it reaches a few dozen times a year. The gap between peak and off-peak operational need is the commercial challenge behind every sports-anchored development, and the reason mixed use is the answer rather than the fashion.

Read More »

Per hotel, not a city average

During the 2026 World Cup, host-city hotel rates rose 13% on average. Miami rose 30.3%. New York fell 4.5%. The average was true and useless: it would have told all 16 cities the same thing, and been wrong for most of them.

Read More »

Show me the evidence

Tell us the question. We'll bring back the answer.

USE CASES

Advancing the Tourism Industry